>What form of enforcement do you envision that is compatible with the First Amendment? The first step would be rolling back "corporations are people and have t

>What form of enforcement do you envision that is compatible with the First Amendment? The first step would be rolling back "corporations are people and have the rights of people." Granting corporations the rights of people turned them into a superior life form that can live forever, reproduce sexually and asexually through mergers and splits, mutate on purpose, own property, cross borders, and do all this with a tax advantage over humans. Willfully seeding the world with a superior life form was not a good idea, and today they have the lobbying budgets and first amendment rights to make sure they retain that primacy. I agree corporations need to be able to curate speech, but the first amendment is not the framework to use to justify this.