>Current models of the entire planetary ecosystem are admittedly quite primitive, but they often have proven to be predictive. I am not sure the current model

>Current models of the entire planetary ecosystem are admittedly quite primitive, but they often have proven to be predictive. I am not sure the current model has predictive power. Predictions in science have to be specific enough to yield testable result. However, predictions of this sort have been vague enough to be inclusive of any anomalies. And this characteristic is a common hallmark of non-science. I am not saying that climatology is non-science. However, I do think that there are claims being made that are not entirely scientific.