That's not about public data. Reference [7] talked about creating fake accounts to scrape. > hiQ had prevailed on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) “unau

That's not about public data. Reference [7] talked about creating fake accounts to scrape. > hiQ had prevailed on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) “unauthorized access” issue related to public website data but was facing a ruling that it had breached LinkedIn’s User Agreement due to its scraping and creation of fake accounts (subject to its equitable defenses). https://natlawreview.com/article/hiq-and-linkedin-reach-proposed-settlement-landmark-scraping-case https://natlawreview.com/article/hiq-and-linkedin-reach-prop...