Even NDT, a scientist, agrees with me (at least in this clip...I bet I could find one of him disagreeing with himself though [1]): https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMr58u

Even NDT, a scientist, agrees with me (at least in this clip...I bet I could find one of him disagreeing with himself though [1]): https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMr58uBqg/ https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMr58uBqg/ I propose this is a bit of a checkmate - thoughts/memes/rhetoric? [1] I very much enjoy pointing out the flaws (logical inconsistency) in "scientific thinking" as it is...which is another instance of the very same abstract phenomenon Neil is talking about here, "as it is-ness", as opposed to how it is intended and asserted as a fact to be (which is literally what you are doing in this argument)... I wonder if he ever considered that he too (and all of his "intellectually superior" to my kind) scientific colleagues) suffers from this very same problem, and also the degree to which he has considered it.