3 ms·
It isn't valid. It is deprecated. Just like <blink>. But to be fair, the page doesn't specify which HTML standard we're working with.
by codingdave 2y ago
It isn't valid. It is deprecated. Just like <blink>. But to be fair, the page doesn't specify which HTML standard we're working with.
- wongarsu 2y agoHTML5 says it "must not be used by authors", but it still describes it as a tag, and describes what an implementation must conform to. I guess it's open to interpretation what "valid" means. But it is an HTML tag described by the HTML standard (both HTML5[1] and the WhatWG HTML spec [2]) [1]: https://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110405/obsolete.html#the-marquee-element https://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110405/obsolete.html#t... [2]: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#the-marquee-element-2 https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#the-ma...
- TonyTrapp 2y agoTo be clear: Neither blink nor marquee were valid tags under any HTML standard. They always were non-standard browser extensions.
- mynameisvlad 2y agoIt's a "non-conforming feature" but it's still a part of WhatWG's standard as obsolete, including what it should render as: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#the-marquee-element-2 https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#the-ma... and https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#the-marquee-element https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#the-mar...