3 ms·
To me this both sounds perfectly reasonable for the Logseq developers to ignore, and for a fork to be made to add it.
by Zambyte 2y ago
To me this both sounds perfectly reasonable for the Logseq developers to ignore, and for a fork to be made to add it.
- byefruit 2y ago100% agree. If users want to remove a feature that funds maintenance and development of the project then they should really just fork it.
- Zambyte 2y agoIn this case they would be adding a feature that complements the feature they depend on for funding with one that would be free to use, rather than removing anything.