5 ms·
It's a misconception that the Planck length represents the smallest possible length.
by rybosworld 2y ago
It's a misconception that the Planck length represents the smallest possible length.
- karmakurtisaani 2y agoIndeed, thanks for the correction! However, it would probably be enough for any simulation to be good enough.
- smitty1e 2y agoMy point is that "probably" falls short of rigorous mathematical proof.
- karmakurtisaani 2y agoSurely you're not expecting anything rigorous related to the simulation hypothesis..
- smitty1e 2y agoI find it intellectually unsatisfying, so no. But the way semi-serious people kick the idea around, sure. Pony up. I don't think that my religious beliefs submit to rigor, either. But I'm not here pushing something labeled as "religious beliefs" as a "hypothesis", either. By the same token, if someone wants to call it the "Simulation Belief" in a religious sense, then I will lay by my dish.