3 ms·
I think that is too much infrastructure for just a link. I think links are fine the way they are today. There are other problems with the web, but it's not link
by figassis 2y ago
I think that is too much infrastructure for just a link. I think links are fine the way they are today. There are other problems with the web, but it's not links. Also, simetimes taking a look is the same as acting on it. Clicking on an link in outlook is often acting on it, if it's some script or whatever it is that people do on outlook.
- __MatrixMan__ 2y agoIf it's content addressed you can gossip content between users, so I'd say it's far less infrastructure because you don't need servers. But I know what you mean, it's a lot for the user to manage. I'm just looking for something drastic to change because the web as it is makes me feel like a rat in a maze. I'm trying to figure out how to leave notes on the walls for the other rats.