3 ms·
I think this is a good insight. When designing a notation, you're choosing what parts of a work you consider to be essential (notated) and non-essential (non-n
by munificent 2y ago
I think this is a good insight.
When designing a notation, you're choosing what parts of a work you consider to be essential (notated) and non-essential (non-notated). That is itself an artistic choice. Everything you choose to not represent in the notation is something that you are letting future performers or cover artists choose for themselves.
The notation serves as sort of a negotiated dividing line between what the original artist wants to claim for themselves and consider a required part of "the work" versus what future artists are allowed to participate in.
Given that modular music is rarely played by anyone except the original author, I suspect that standardized notation isn't very important. All that really matters is each author having their own private shorthand so they can recreate what they care to recreate.
- goblin89 2y agoWhere to improvise is always up to the performer. Even a precise score can be reinterpreted creatively, it is nothing but a hint.
- 8bitsrule 2y agoTrue today! In classical orchestra performances, that usually required the composer to insert a solo 'cadenza' section where the soloist was free to be expressive without a conductor 'click-track'. Today, bands (esp. jam bands like the Dead) might agree to back up anyone who decides to go 'off-plan'. (These days, we can even take big samples of someone else's tracks (if they agree) and do 'covers' that are an entire re-working of their originals.)