4 ms·
That's a real flaw, a old 15" MBP with 1680x1050 would practically be a better choice. This is just dumb, that a 2880x1800 display is worse than a 1680x1050 dis
by zyb09 14y ago
That's a real flaw, a old 15" MBP with 1680x1050 would practically be a better choice. This is just dumb, that a 2880x1800 display is worse than a 1680x1050 display because of the way the software handles these resolutions. Unless I'm missing something...
- alexobenauer 14y agoThat's interesting... I didn't realize this until you said it. I currently have the 15" MBP at 1680x1050. Buying the new retina display would be a downgrade in screen real estate, since it would show an equivalent 1440x900. Sure it would be crisper, but when I'm developing on my laptop, it's all about screen real estate. This is odd.
- rorrr 14y agoHow the fuck is it a "downgrade"? You get higher resolution.
- wmf 14y agoLess stuff fits on the screen.
- tomkinstinch 14y agoHow so? The new one has a physical resolution of 2,880 × 1800 pixels. The density is higher, so text can be scaled smaller and still be legible. Are you questioning how large UI widgets will appear?
- 3diablo3 14y agothat depends on how mountain lion implements the high dpi mode. when using linux or windows on it you will get full resolution, osx will be a blend, icons such as close/minimise... will be scaled up but the actual content will be crazy rez.. just wait until it comes out before you say it is only 1440x900 which it is NOT.
- orangecat 14y agoIn the worst case, the OS widgets will take up more space than you'd like. But for development most of your display is text, and you'll be able to significantly reduce the font size and maintain readability.