2 ms·

I had more in mind that the PaaS goes bad (corruption, incompetence, many causes) and allows bad players in and then yes bad things happen to existing tenants (

by m3047 2y ago

I had more in mind that the PaaS goes bad (corruption, incompetence, many causes) and allows bad players in and then yes bad things happen to existing tenants (or new tenants unaware of what's going on). I guess that's part one, because part two would be that neither the PaaS or the people doing bad things to them inform these innocent third parties: there's no "declaration of war" between the PaaS and soi disant defenders, no signage, and no bodies because they're sniping with heavy weps which vaporize the bodies. Edit: It could also just be "broken windows", they shot up the place and moved on, but the soi disant defenders are still shooting at survivors going to the well. Thanks for letting me clarify.

verdverm 2y ago
The bad actors are never going to tell you they are As for analogies, some launch points... - "one bad apple spoils the bunch" - something about bad neighbors - leading horse to water - poisoning the well Have you tried brainstorming with an LLM?
- m3047 2y ago
  > The bad actors are never going to tell you they are Let's stop talking about bad actors. The people doing the sniping think they're defenders. The PaaS is staffed by mostly well-intentioned people but they're poorly managed and they keep getting called to work on features instead of fixing vulnerabilities. > Have you tried brainstorming with an LLM? Maybe we should just move on.
m3047 2y ago
> people doing bad things to them inform these innocent third parties Let me also clarify and re-iterate: the people doing bad things to the innocent third parties aren't the bad people, it's the soi disant defenders who are shooting at them.