3 ms·
Sure, but we're often making sparing use of what make has to offer, like the pattern rules. I think that's okay, but it is also a reminder that perhaps there i
by bborud 2y ago
Sure, but we're often making sparing use of what make has to offer, like the pattern rules. I think that's okay, but it is also a reminder that perhaps there is room for a similar tool that can support patterns and built-in mechanisms that are more useful to today's languages. Rust and Go in particular.
I think there is a huge difference between implementing logic in bash and invoking programs using shell syntax.
I am aware of the fact that a lot of people used to put shell script beyond simple invocations in Makefiles, but I see that as a degenerate case. You shouldn't do that.
- Arch-TK 2y ago> I am aware of the fact that a lot of people used to put shell script beyond simple invocations in Makefiles, but I see that as a degenerate case. You shouldn't do that. Okay, so I am not sure why you seemed to object to my initial comment specifically talking about this kind of use of Make.