4 ms·
I doubt that's true because it goes against every modern OS security practice. Apple heavily practices defense-in-depth. Sandboxing, PAC, AMFID, etc. All those
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
I doubt that's true because it goes against every modern OS security practice. Apple heavily practices defense-in-depth. Sandboxing, PAC, AMFID, etc. All those are even more onerous than Android. So no, giving away JIT privs wouldn't do much.
EDIT: What's with the downvoting?
- teaearlgraycold 2y agoMy understanding comes from what jailbreakers say about the OS, what Apple says, as well as time spent working at Android where people that know what they’re talking about told me about iOS security.
- deaddodo 2y agoYour misunderstanding comes from a group of misinformed individuals than. Or you've made them up. Either way, you're wrong.
- Qwertious 2y ago>Either way, you're wrong. This claim is based on what expertise?
- deaddodo 2y agoThere are about a dozen other responders who agree with said assessment with technical reasonings embedded into their messages. Read those. Suffice to say, I don't feel the need to rehash why the basic premise of "the OS wasn't built to handle JIT apps" is directly contradicted by it, you know, allowing JIT in all but one app. If they offered something of a basic technical assessment or reasoning beyond "I know people", perhaps then I would bother to dig into some credentialed argument. So, in the same way it's not worth delving into "proving God doesn't exist", it's not worth proving how OP clearly has no idea what they're talking about. They bear the burden of their claims, not me.