2 ms·
No, what I said is not nonsense at all. I was arguing that, on originalist grounds, incorporation ought to be rejected, which would mean no incorporation for th
by skissane 2y ago
No, what I said is not nonsense at all. I was arguing that, on originalist grounds, incorporation ought to be rejected, which would mean no incorporation for the 2nd – but not for the 1st either. Whereas I'm not sure what you are even trying to say.