3 ms·
Random squares is absolutely not cheating -- if you really really want a grid, you can always draw one out from the square you found. Indeed, not picking the g
by andrewaylett 2y ago
Random squares is absolutely not cheating -- if you really really want a grid, you can always draw one out from the square you found.
Indeed, not picking the grid that gives you the best answer might be considered cheating :). Unless you're explicitly going for OS grid reference square kilometres, which the first grid may have been -- but I see no evidence that the author did so.
And if you want to really not cheat, you probably need to consider rotating your grid too.
All that said, I concur that it probably doesn't change the result very much. I'm just slightly disappointed that the author thought that improving his method to get a more correct answer was "cheating".
- mcmoor 2y agoI've seen someone do the most populated circle in the world, with varying radius, and it's very interesting https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/y51w28/a_novel_more_objective_method_of_ranking_the/ https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/y51w28/a_n... . Lots of comments say that it's not the most objective but I say it is, because of your comment.
- teaearlgraycold 2y agoCompletely agree. This is too easy if you use a standard grid.