3 ms·
Wasn't that just because it was tiny (0.026 square kilometre) and a population of 35,000? I think for a discussion about "most densely populated square kilometr
by arethuza 2y ago
Wasn't that just because it was tiny (0.026 square kilometre) and a population of 35,000? I think for a discussion about "most densely populated square kilometres" we should actually be talking about square kilometres?
- HPsquared 2y agoFair enough. That 0.026 sq.km. has more people living in it than the most densely populated full sq.km. in the UK though, which must count for something. I wonder what the population of the square kilometre centred on KWC is/was.