3 ms·
The fact they didn't loudly announce this 'feature' has seriously undermined their trustworthiness, for me at least. What's the expression; 'So much depends on
by jacknews 2y ago
The fact they didn't loudly announce this 'feature' has seriously undermined their trustworthiness, for me at least.
What's the expression; 'So much depends on reputation. Guard it with your life'. Mozilla seem to be just throwing it away.
- jopsen 2y agoWho would rather trust? Apple, Microsoft, Google? Realistically, these are the organizations that can afford to develop a high performance browser engine. All the chrome and firefox forks probably don't have the devs or infrastructure to fork blink/gecko and keep up with security and features. It's easy to be excited about Ladybird -- and maybe it will work, MAYBE. It's fair to argue that we've let the web evolve into such an advanced platform that building a secure high performance browser is a HUGE moat. People are so fast to criticize Mozilla. Maybe, this isn't all bad.
- jacknews 2y agowhataboutism? Sure I trust Mozilla more than Google/Microsoft. But less so, now.
- spencerflem 2y agoI agree with you- people are really weird about Mozilla, and I almost always defend them (check my comment history) But wow this is vile. I did not expect this from them. Bad enough that I'm not sure if I can reccomend Firefox over a fork anymore