Once again, I have to stick my ore in here and chill for LibreWolf :D I think it might really be worth checking out for people like me that prefer the user inte

Once again, I have to stick my ore in here and chill for LibreWolf :D I think it might really be worth checking out for people like me that prefer the user interface and functionality of Firefox over chromium and don't want to contribute to the blink engine monopoly, but also often doesn't approve of what Mozilla is doing upstream and wants someone to shield them from it. It's my daily drive for browser for basically everything, and 99% of the time, even on stuff that you would think wouldn't work, it works just fine. I keep chromium in my back pocket just in case, but I've only had to pull chromium out like twice in the past year, once for something that required the USB-HID protocol and once for iCloud. And yes, for those of you on distributions, you might say that your distribution maintainers will just patch out or customize out, and the nefarious changes that Mozilla makes upstream. But the thing you have to remember is that distribution maintainers are handling, by a whole lot of other things, tens of thousands of other packages, and an entire operating system, and its upkeep, go through them. So they will often just not patch out or patch things out inconsistently or not really pay attention. I think it's much better to rely on a project whose whole purpose and explicit mission is making Mozilla more privacy-friendly and secure and who have a dedicated community of a few developers consistently working on it. Especially since distribution maintainers don't really make any specific mission statement promises with regards to specific packages, but something like LW does. It does a lot more than just this one thing. It's essentially equivalent to having a arkenfox config maintained for you and always applied to your browser and updated in lockstep with your browser, as well as a set of patches that they maintain to remove things like Pocket.