4 ms·
> I'm not affiliated with Mozilla, but I do understand how wikis work. ;-) You don't seem to understand why this is problematic though, so I'll explain it to y
by lkdfjlkdfjlg 2y ago
> I'm not affiliated with Mozilla, but I do understand how wikis work. ;-)
You don't seem to understand why this is problematic though, so I'll explain it to you: enabling tracking when you know that one of your selling points to your users is respect for privacy is a huge breach of trust.
- intelVISA 2y agoTo be fair, I don't think that has been an active Mozilla mission for close to a decade now. They mostly exist as a Google owned shell now...
- lkdfjlkdfjlg 2y agoMaybe it hasn't been an active Mozilla mission for a decade in practice, but they did paid it lip service many times in the past decade, so still counts as breach of trust.
- tredre3 2y ago> To be fair, I don't think that has been an active Mozilla mission for close to a decade now. Ok, maybe they should update firefox's home page, then? Very first lines: > Get the browser that protects what's important > No shady privacy policies or back doors for advertisers. Just a lightning fast browser that doesn’t sell you out.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoGP did say "active mission". I'm sure Google had "Do no evil" on their site for maybe 4 years after they in fact started being evil.
- tedunangst 2y agoWhat do you expect thangalin to do with this understanding?
- lkdfjlkdfjlg 2y agoBe less pretentious.