3 ms·

Yes exactly like his empty threats to pack the supreme court to end the right to abortion, or how he would refuse to accept election results if he lost. Just ho

by kmos17 2y ago

Yes exactly like his empty threats to pack the supreme court to end the right to abortion, or how he would refuse to accept election results if he lost. Just hollow gibberish right? Oh wait..

hnpolicestate 2y ago
None of those things happened. Implanted narrative.
- webninja 2y ago
  I’m not sure why you’re being downvoted. The surpreme court moved to make abortion a states-rights issue. This is the correct and most moderate move for any politician or political body to make on the most polarizing and most divisive issue. Perhaps the only thing better would’ve been to make it a county’s-rights issue but that’s now up to the states. Anyone that wants an abortion can just fly to a liberal state for one as long as at least 1 liberal state still exists. Furthermore, the court made it so states cannot ban the abortion pill, which can be received by mail. The surpreme court is the only section of government designed to minimize or remove bias by letting its supreme judges for life. This means the judges get to make decisions based on what they think is right decision rather than some policial leaning decision. By design, they don’t need to worry anymore about whether they need to appeal to any policial campaign funding party for a reelection bid. It successfully takes money out of politics. I’m firmly on the side of pro-choice and I’m not one to talk positively about government bodies but the Supreme Court is functioning extremely well. It’s doing a commendable job with so many intricate & difficult cases.
  - ragequittah 2y ago
    "Anyone that wants an abortion can just fly to a liberal state for one as long as at least 1 liberal state still exists." Let me just take time off work book a hotel and buy a plane ticket when I can't even afford rent.
    - hnpolicestate 2y ago
      Liberals wouldn't even grant that to Americans wishing to travel to a state that acknowledges the 2nd amendment. Liberals want guns banned in locations whose populations overwhelmingly support gun rights. It would be like republicans trying to ban abortion in San Francisco. Unequal application of power. Very bad for democracy.
      - kmos17 2y ago
        Liberals disagree about how the second amendment should be interpreted, and even do so amongst themselves. Even Republicans used to be for reasonable gun control measures not so long ago.
  - kmos17 2y ago
    You are seriously deluded if you think the abortion pill or a federal ban on abortion are not next. Also interesting how neither of you addressed the other point: he announced as early as 2016 that he would not accept the election results if he lost, he lost and he still has not accepted the results. The peaceful transfer of power is a central tenet of our election system, and it relies on candidates accepting defeat when they lose, and not cynically enraging their followers with lies.
    - hnpolicestate 2y ago
      He accepted defeat after going through all the constitutionally protected steps to contest the results. Democrats basically took the 2000 Florida recount and turned it into the Reichstag Fire. Narrative not reality.
      - kmos17 2y ago
        He still has not conceded or acknowledged defeat to this day. He went way beyond constitutionally protected steps, including in Georgia trying to pressure the Republican in charge to flip the election for him Gore conceded, the supreme court stepped in to stop the recount. The full recount would have most likely given florida to Gore since palm beach county was the one still not fully counted and heavily democratic. But Gore conceded to avoid a constitutional crisis. Instead we got Bush who dragged us into the completely unjustified Iraq war. Both the exact opposite of what you are stating.
        pyronik19 2y ago
        [dead]
    - webninja 2y ago
      >You are seriously deluded if you think the abortion pill or a federal ban on abortion are not next. You’re seriously deluded if you think either of those are next. I’m confidently willing to bet money that the furthest it will go during the next 4 years is a states-rights issue. Which is no-change from what it is now -because- the supreme court have already decided on this issue. Furthermore the president elect says that in all of his interviews regarding the topic of abortion and you would see that if you just watched one of the ones in the last few years. [Citation Needed?] Okay the 2 hr Dr. Phil interview with him and the presidential debate are two of many. Yeah that’s an unusually and unexpectedly moderate take but there it is. Look at all the interviews yourself. Look at the court cases yourself. See it with your own eyes. You should view the news sources that have deluded you with your incorrect views with contempt and hate. Their actions of intentionally misleading you is an act of evil. Anyone that tells you lies is a bad person. The ones most motivated to tell those lies are commonly the one-world government globalists. They’re motivated by their cartoon-like visions of world domination. The same people that want a future for you where they allege “You’ll own nothing and be happy.” Yeah where most of your happiness comes from anti-depressant pills.
- kmos17 2y ago
  You can choose to stay in a bubble because you do not want to accept anything contrary to your beliefs or look at the facts. Both did happen.

by kmos17 2y ago

Yes exactly like his empty threats to pack the supreme court to end the right to abortion, or how he would refuse to accept election results if he lost. Just hollow gibberish right? Oh wait..

hnpolicestate 2y ago

None of those things happened. Implanted narrative.

webninja 2y ago
I’m not sure why you’re being downvoted. The surpreme court moved to make abortion a states-rights issue. This is the correct and most moderate move for any politician or political body to make on the most polarizing and most divisive issue. Perhaps the only thing better would’ve been to make it a county’s-rights issue but that’s now up to the states. Anyone that wants an abortion can just fly to a liberal state for one as long as at least 1 liberal state still exists. Furthermore, the court made it so states cannot ban the abortion pill, which can be received by mail. The surpreme court is the only section of government designed to minimize or remove bias by letting its supreme judges for life. This means the judges get to make decisions based on what they think is right decision rather than some policial leaning decision. By design, they don’t need to worry anymore about whether they need to appeal to any policial campaign funding party for a reelection bid. It successfully takes money out of politics. I’m firmly on the side of pro-choice and I’m not one to talk positively about government bodies but the Supreme Court is functioning extremely well. It’s doing a commendable job with so many intricate & difficult cases.
- ragequittah 2y ago
  "Anyone that wants an abortion can just fly to a liberal state for one as long as at least 1 liberal state still exists." Let me just take time off work book a hotel and buy a plane ticket when I can't even afford rent.
  - hnpolicestate 2y ago
    Liberals wouldn't even grant that to Americans wishing to travel to a state that acknowledges the 2nd amendment. Liberals want guns banned in locations whose populations overwhelmingly support gun rights. It would be like republicans trying to ban abortion in San Francisco. Unequal application of power. Very bad for democracy.
    - kmos17 2y ago
      Liberals disagree about how the second amendment should be interpreted, and even do so amongst themselves. Even Republicans used to be for reasonable gun control measures not so long ago.
- kmos17 2y ago
  You are seriously deluded if you think the abortion pill or a federal ban on abortion are not next. Also interesting how neither of you addressed the other point: he announced as early as 2016 that he would not accept the election results if he lost, he lost and he still has not accepted the results. The peaceful transfer of power is a central tenet of our election system, and it relies on candidates accepting defeat when they lose, and not cynically enraging their followers with lies.
  - hnpolicestate 2y ago
    He accepted defeat after going through all the constitutionally protected steps to contest the results. Democrats basically took the 2000 Florida recount and turned it into the Reichstag Fire. Narrative not reality.
    - kmos17 2y ago
      He still has not conceded or acknowledged defeat to this day. He went way beyond constitutionally protected steps, including in Georgia trying to pressure the Republican in charge to flip the election for him Gore conceded, the supreme court stepped in to stop the recount. The full recount would have most likely given florida to Gore since palm beach county was the one still not fully counted and heavily democratic. But Gore conceded to avoid a constitutional crisis. Instead we got Bush who dragged us into the completely unjustified Iraq war. Both the exact opposite of what you are stating.
      - pyronik19 2y ago
        [dead]
  - webninja 2y ago
    >You are seriously deluded if you think the abortion pill or a federal ban on abortion are not next. You’re seriously deluded if you think either of those are next. I’m confidently willing to bet money that the furthest it will go during the next 4 years is a states-rights issue. Which is no-change from what it is now -because- the supreme court have already decided on this issue. Furthermore the president elect says that in all of his interviews regarding the topic of abortion and you would see that if you just watched one of the ones in the last few years. [Citation Needed?] Okay the 2 hr Dr. Phil interview with him and the presidential debate are two of many. Yeah that’s an unusually and unexpectedly moderate take but there it is. Look at all the interviews yourself. Look at the court cases yourself. See it with your own eyes. You should view the news sources that have deluded you with your incorrect views with contempt and hate. Their actions of intentionally misleading you is an act of evil. Anyone that tells you lies is a bad person. The ones most motivated to tell those lies are commonly the one-world government globalists. They’re motivated by their cartoon-like visions of world domination. The same people that want a future for you where they allege “You’ll own nothing and be happy.” Yeah where most of your happiness comes from anti-depressant pills.
kmos17 2y ago
You can choose to stay in a bubble because you do not want to accept anything contrary to your beliefs or look at the facts. Both did happen.