3 ms·
This is actually good news, since even with all those infected people there was no additional person-to-person transmission found.
by pfdietz 2y ago
This is actually good news, since even with all those infected people there was no additional person-to-person transmission found.
- huppeldepup 2y agoYou know those youtube videos where a puppet in an arena is shown and it’s iteratively selected/respawn/retrained for getting across an obstacle field? This is exactly that. First obstacle has been cleared and now the population is waiting for a mutation that gets them compatible with the human cell wall.
- agilob 2y agoSweet puppy virus solves another puzzle?
- pfdietz 2y agoNo, not really. When the virus gets into a person right now, it's an evolutionary dead end. There's no iteration going on there.
- adammarples 2y agoThis is only true of the virus population in the infected people. The virus population still in birds is still at square 1. When the virus is eradicated from the infected people, we go back to square 1.
- vasco 2y agoGood news would be no transmission, as every new human host is another chance to mutate the virus just enough to make it a big worry.