14 ms·
That's why I said, "Ultimately, it depends on your use case, but IRC's assumptions don't work for me or my peers." If it works for you, great. It doesn't for me
by unsignedint 2y ago
That's why I said, "Ultimately, it depends on your use case, but IRC's assumptions don't work for me or my peers." If it works for you, great. It doesn't for me. (Believe me, I used to use it a lot back then.)
For one thing, I chat with people not just to chat, but to communicate effectively. IRC simply doesn't provide the functionality that aligns with my use cases. It doesn't meet the expectations I have for such systems right out of the box.
Creating and maintaining bots or workarounds just to communicate effectively isn't high on my list of priorities, given everything else I have to do.
- drbig 2y agoFair enough. So less about chat but more about async-first exchange. Sounds like e-mail?
- unsignedint 2y agoRight, and another factor is that I often have to communicate with people in different time zones, sometimes with a 16-17 hour difference. It's nice to have that seamless transition between synchronous and asynchronous communication.