2 ms·
Replying just to “isn't a coherent mental model”: I just took a deep dive into the documentation- which is comprehensive - and I feel the complete opposite; th
by threecheese 2y ago
Replying just to “isn't a coherent mental model”:
I just took a deep dive into the documentation- which is comprehensive - and I feel the complete opposite; the author has a very well refined mental model of a PaaS and has created a modularized source-code expression of that model that I found very interesting. The CI module is called “patrick”, which gave me a chuckle.
You have some good feedback in your post, but I feel like the author may not be trying to replace hosted PaaS; they are essentially using tiny-go to build small distributable wasm modules that can interoperate in a distributed network, which aligns very closely with the localfirst ethos that brings compute and storage out of the datacenter. Does it feel a bit silly to even SAY “client-side CI”? Objectively, yes, but if a future architecture might need to safely deliver code to clients in a mesh this is a really interesting way to experiment with solutions.
- dsamy 2y agoI agree, the CI module name is not the best. While whiteboarding the concept with the team, this http://en.spongepedia.org/index.php?title=Hooky_%28Episode%29 http://en.spongepedia.org/index.php?title=Hooky_%28Episode%2... episode from sponge bob found it way to the discussion so we called it `patrick`.