It's not an ad hominem. Matt Taibi was fed partial information by Musk, and decided to publish it anyway, losing all credibility in the process. And even though

It's not an ad hominem. Matt Taibi was fed partial information by Musk, and decided to publish it anyway, losing all credibility in the process. And even though the data was hand-picked by Musk who had the biggest axe to grind, it ultimately proved nothing beyond the fact that Twitter was receiving numerous requests from all sides of the US government, and that they would scrutinize every request and respect only some of them. Going back to the original claims you have made, Taibi's reporting only showed what was happening before Musk took over, not after, so it doesn't back you up. Sorry if I sounded harsh, but I'm just blown away you ate this journalistic slob up without any critical thinking.