4 ms·
Plenty of software from that vintage works better than modern equivalents. UX is about more than how something looks visually - equally (or more) important is
by ghostpepper 2y ago
Plenty of software from that vintage works better than modern equivalents.
UX is about more than how something looks visually - equally (or more) important is how it behaves, how the user interacts with it, and how it gets out of your way and lets you do your actual work (or doesn't)
- alberth 2y agoI don't disagree. But it's the author who is implying that "legacy = bad" Note: I genuinely love Windows 2000 UI/UX (and wish it still existed today)