4 ms·
I appreciate your response but I wouldn't blame you if you didn't want to wrangle and coerce LLMs to do proper reasoning, it becomes boring quickly.
by onemoresoop 2y ago
I appreciate your response but I wouldn't blame you if you didn't want to wrangle and coerce LLMs to do proper reasoning, it becomes boring quickly.
- Kim_Bruning 2y agoI was lazy and did it with GPT-4, since that actually does manage to solve the problem. GPT-4 is -of course- slower. https://chatgpt.com/share/2ac767d9-2a6b-4631-b071-7266e001a14d https://chatgpt.com/share/2ac767d9-2a6b-4631-b071-7266e001a1...
- onemoresoop 2y agoOk, I guess it appears to work with a bit of nudging on your part. But if you look carefully it still fails and the wolf hallucinates itself back into existence in the last prompt, step 4. My conclusion with LLMs is "Close but no cigar" when it comes to reasoning deviated from the script. Maybe it will get better but something has to change to make this work, more parameters or training will only make it appear to work better but still fail. Even flawed I still find LLMS and GenAI useful for some tasks such as brainstorming though.