4 ms·
So just to understand this correctly, you're suggesting that they have some people/processes dedicated to keeping track of any canary string published by anyone
by jhugo 2y ago
So just to understand this correctly, you're suggesting that they have some people/processes dedicated to keeping track of any canary string published by anyone (or some defined subset of "anyone"), and updating their ingest to ignore any documents that contain those strings?
- PostOnce 2y agoI explained above that they don't have to care, but if they're going to want to be included on major industry benchmarks like those created by Google, they should probably go to the effort of ignoring the half dozen or so notable benchmarks with canary GUIDs. Blacklisting a GUID is not difficult, not even at web-scale.