4 ms·
// Most companies don’t buy jets and yachts // True, but it is also hyperbole to say the government is terminally wasteful. Most departments of the government
by rhelz 2y ago
// Most companies don’t buy jets and yachts //
True, but it is also hyperbole to say the government is terminally wasteful. Most departments of the government are very efficient. Social Security, for example, has an administrative overhead of 0.5%. That compares very favorably to any of the funds in my 401k.
// Shareholders voted and approved this compensation package, twice. //
Just because shareholders voted for it doesn't' mean it's not a big fat waste of money. While we're on the subject, how about Musk paying 2x the real value of Twitter?
// ure there are some packages that are irresponsible but usually there’s a good reason they are what they are, //
And again, most of what is pilloried as "government waste" usually has a good reason too. To suggest otherwise is hyperbole.
// simply don’t understand hiring for those kinds of roles
chuckle let me tell you a story about the time I made $25 million in one all-nighter :-) I was working in Manhattan, for a very well-known financial firm. One day I noticed that one of our regulatory filings was going to be late. I told my boss and he said not to worry about it. So I escalated it to his boss--who also told me not to worry about it.
I figured that I could regenerate the report and submit it on time, but only if I worked all night. So I did. I was just finishing up at about 8:30am, when the president came to my desk and said "THANKYOU so much for submitting that report!" I thought great--I finally caught the attention of the execs.
He came around again at 5:00pm and thanked me again. I thought wow, I'm in.
The next day they fired him :-) Turns out, he had a $25 million golden parachute--and one of the conditions was that there were no late regulatory filings....so I worked all night, and he got $25 million.
But wait!!! There's more!! in 24 hours, I had gone from the president's favorite--to being the guy who just cost the company $25 million. You can't really fire somebody for obeying the law, but you sure can gaslight the shirt out of them. I eventually had to quit, and I'm still looking for a job.
Don't tell me in those condescending tones that I don't know what those bonuses are for. And again, if you think the private sector is some uniformly wonderful example of efficiency you are the one who is out of touch with what goes on in the C-suite.
- Jensson 2y agoSo you are telling me that the company tried to save money by not giving the exec what he deserved by sabotaging the conditions for his bonus? How is that relevant here? You just provided evidence that private companies work hard to not pay execs those bonuses to save money, that goes directly against what you are arguing. If they were as wasteful as you said and as willing to give out such bonuses they wouldn't have cared, but you yourself said they did. In the end the private sector wants to make money, that includes clawing back bonuses promised to execs etc, they want to save money however they can. The same can't be said for the public sector. That makes them entirely different.
- rhelz 2y ago> are telling me that the company tried to save money by not giving the exec what he deserved Not at all, and sorry if I gave that impression. I only wrote what I know and saw. I don't know anything more than that. > You just provided evidence that private companies work hard to not pay execs those bonuses to save money, that goes directly against what you are arguing. Surely you are not equating cheating with efficiency? And surely you aren't suggesting that nobody in government ever cheats :-)