For this specifically? I dunno, I mean let Apple release a new flop AVP every year for the next 5 years and so long as the rest of the company performs like it

For this specifically? I dunno, I mean let Apple release a new flop AVP every year for the next 5 years and so long as the rest of the company performs like it has during the last decade then it still isn't really more than a dent against the guy. Vanishingly few want leadership out because of a single botched product launch that didn't even prevent the quarterly numbers from being extremely strong. Maybe there are other reasons that factor into why you think Tim should go as well but that's not really "for this" then (and probably still not a generally popular conclusion but at least more reasonably based).