3 ms·
I'm sure there's plenty I haven't realized, but the reason it's worth pointing out that LLM's are not intelligent, is that their boosters routinely refer to the
by rossdavidh 2y ago
I'm sure there's plenty I haven't realized, but the reason it's worth pointing out that LLM's are not intelligent, is that their boosters routinely refer to them as "AI", and the "I" in there stands for "intelligence", so pointing out that the label applied is not accurate, is important.
- stavros 2y agoIn that case, what AI system do you feel that the label can be applied to?
- rossdavidh 2y agoI don't think there is one. Many researchers had tried to switch the field to using "ML" instead, since it's a lot more accurate of a label, but it doesn't hype as well, and that appears to have been the decisive factor.
- stavros 2y agoWhen I did my masters fifteen years ago, it was a masters in "machine learning". AI was already just what laypeople called it. If your argument is that "this isn't AGI", I don't think anyone at all disagrees, but then that's a bit of a tautology.