> so the problem starts here; does the piece of code copilot emits, if written by yourself also would be infringing ? why everyone on discussions tries to brin

> so the problem starts here; does the piece of code copilot emits, if written by yourself also would be infringing ? why everyone on discussions tries to bring "if a human made it"? a generative AI operates way faster than anyone ever existed and ever will and probably a person aware of the license & acting respectful towards it, will create something more sensible/plausible to avoid plagiarism now having dozen/hundreds/thousands of humans substituted by a machine that makes money for some for-profit company is really fair? even if they were a non-profit, as someone pointed up, people who create the content that feeds the weights aren't recieving a penny! they already made money with it, they will make more & that is/will upgrading/e the state of gen. AI for sure legal battles on people copying code from permissive licenses should exist but it's feels a different discussion