> The thing that is misleading is pretending that being open source only makes them $300/month while ignoring the number of customers who chose them because the

> The thing that is misleading is pretending that being open source only makes them $300/month while ignoring the number of customers who chose them because they are open source. No, that one line without the entire preceeding part of the blog post makes it sound like that. However when the blog post opens with > That license change has helped us build a sustainable open source project with 8 core team members and several paid external contributors at the time of writing. It's abundantly clear that they attribute that success to their open core model.