4 ms·
The 12.1% effective tax rate being claimed in multiple posts here is a temporary number due to a one time tax break for 2010 and 2011 that will expire. After wh
by adventureful 14y ago
The 12.1% effective tax rate being claimed in multiple posts here is a temporary number due to a one time tax break for 2010 and 2011 that will expire. After which the effective US corporate tax rate will skyrocket back up to around 25% to 26% or so. And it's worth noting, it's a front loaded expensing, versus expensing over a period of years, so that 12.1% is completely deceiving.
"In 2010 and 2011, companies were allowed to deduct the full cost of the purchases of new equipment, while normally these costs would be expensed over several years. In 2012, this deduction will go down to 50% and be eliminated altogether thereafter, causing the effective tax rate to return to roughly the 25.6% average effective tax rate corporations paid since the late 1980s, according to CBO forecasts."
http://business.time.com/2012/02/06/the-corporate-tax-rate-is-at-its-lowest-in-decades-is-big-business-paying-its-fair-share/ http://business.time.com/2012/02/06/the-corporate-tax-rate-i...
- adgar 14y agoMy father started a small roofing business in 1980, selling it just recently to an employee; that tax break was absolutely crucial to getting work going again. Luckily, my father's now-sold business had the bankroll to take full advantage of it. The credit others needed wasn't trivial to come by.
- adventureful 14y agoJust to clarify, I wasn't arguing for or against the expensing tax adjustment break (nor whether it was a benefit to the economy). I was pointing out that the claimed 12.1% effective tax rate isn't an accurate representation of corporate taxation in the US.
- adgar 14y agoYep, I know, just chiming in with some relevant experience.