There could probably be a way to word the agreement to ensure the open part remains under the AGPL, such as one of the following: - include in the terms of the

There could probably be a way to word the agreement to ensure the open part remains under the AGPL, such as one of the following: - include in the terms of the CLA that Plausible will never change the license of any part currently licensed as AGPL to another license without the consent of all contributors, or make the CLA conditional on the code modified continuing to be available under the AGPL - limit the license rights of Plausible to very specific uses which wouldn't allow relicensing the entire repo - have the contributor agree to dual license their contribution with a license like the MPL to Plausible, which would allow combining with separate enterprise code, but wouldn't allow them to relicense the source files modified by the contributor. I think the GPL would also work for that, unless Plausible starts distibuting an enterprise self hosted version.