> Then they basically asked them to prove it would catastrophically fail at the temperatures expected the next morning, which they couldn't conclusively do sinc

> Then they basically asked them to prove it would catastrophically fail at the temperatures expected the next morning, which they couldn't conclusively do since they didn't have the data to back it up. Turns out they _did_ conclusively prove that, just not within the time or budget (or casualty) constraints demanded by management at the time. :sigh: