4 ms·

And the decision itself was a rug pull from many years of legal precedent too. Roe v Wade also did exactly just that. I presume you dislike those two decisions

• Joel_Mckay 2y ago
  > Surely any decision that creates a new precedent will inherently be a rug pull? Unless the "new precedent" is arbitrary random daily policy common in despotic regimes like Russia. i.e. one has no clue what will happen when they step outside everyday. In general, legal consensus is supposed to evolve from _many_ trials with civilians deciding on what legislated policy is appropriate to enforce for its residents. Giving 40 years of people that sat through jury duty in 8000 trials a troll... is not what justice, accountability, and due process is supposed to look like. It is not my opinion that matters... but I do like popcorn nom nom nom =3