This is a common argument to support the usage of LLMs: "Well, humans do it too." We have many rules, regulations, strategies, patterns, and legions of manager

This is a common argument to support the usage of LLMs: "Well, humans do it too." We have many rules, regulations, strategies, patterns, and legions of managers and management philosophy for dealing with humans. With humans, they're incorrect sometimes, yes, and we actively work around their failures. We expect humans to develop over time. We expect them to join a profession and give bad answers a lot. As time goes on, we expect them to produce better answers, and if they don't we have remediations to limit the negative impact they have on our business processes. We fire them. We recommend they transfer to a different discipline. We recommend they go to college. Comparing the successes and failures of LLMs to humans is silly. We would have fired them all by now. The big difference is that computers CAN get every single question correctly. They ARE better than humans. LLMs are a huge step back from the benefits we got from computers.