4 ms·
From the article: >“Losing to A.I., in a sense, meant my entire world was collapsing,” he said in a recent interview with The New York Times. >Mr. Lee had a h
by htrp 2y ago
From the article:
>“Losing to A.I., in a sense, meant my entire world was collapsing,” he said in a recent interview with The New York Times.
>Mr. Lee had a hard time accepting the defeat. What he regarded as an art form, an extension of a player’s own personality and style, was now cast aside for an algorithm’s ruthless efficiency.
--------
He also retired 3 years later and has had some time to reflect on the situation.
For people whose sole source of identity is their job/profession, Lee Saedol is a cautionary tale.
What used to take a dedicated research team and millions of dollars of compute (to play professional go), can now be done with a sub $1 gpt4 call (to do something like make strategy slides).
- Slyfox33 2y agoWhat? LLMs are definitely not used to play go even close to this level.
- mathsmath 2y ago> What used to take a dedicated research team and millions of dollars of compute (to play professional go), can now be done with a sub $1 gpt4 call (to do something like make strategy slides). Is that an accurate statement, though? AFAIK, the Go-AI was hyper-specific to Go. I don’t think any LLM would approach the level of skill exhibited by those specialized AIs (much less provide valid moves for an entire game in my experience).
- htrp 2y agoI'd say if you are a copywriter, your job is effectively already gone of you aren't using transformer based large language models