In US law to establish standing, you have to demonstrate injury-in-fact, causation, and redressability based on the Article III limit requiring courts to addres

In US law to establish standing, you have to demonstrate injury-in-fact, causation, and redressability based on the Article III limit requiring courts to address "cases" and "controversies." This makes us great at redressing harm, and terrible at preventing harm. A lot of modern technology is such an effective force multiplier that the process of establishing standing and having a hearing before a preliminary injunction can be catastrophic, far beyond what was possible when the Constitution was drafted. Under Chevron, judges deferred to reasonable regulatory interpretations. Now it's a slower, more adversarial process. I hope you're right and the answer is to just grow the government and judiciary.