> This cannot be challenged because Chevron was in place Respectfully, language like this makes you look very partisan. Of course it could be challenged. How d

> This cannot be challenged because Chevron was in place Respectfully, language like this makes you look very partisan. Of course it could be challenged. How do you think Chevron got thrown out? Because something concerning it was challenged. Still, it doesn't support your claim that Chevron means that an agency can interpret the constitution. That's not at all what Chevron says and it isn't true.