4 ms·
Instead now the interpretation depends on the court that hears the case? And could change every time it is heard? With the current Supreme Court leaving stare
by jandrese 2y ago
Instead now the interpretation depends on the court that hears the case? And could change every time it is heard? With the current Supreme Court leaving stare decisis dead and buried it's the legal wild west.
I have to wonder which circuits will be most favorable to the people who want to overturn regulation. Will it be East Texas again? Companies will have a lot of leeway to forum shop when looking to deregulate themselves.
- twoodfin 2y agoYes, like any other statutory interpretation case, which judges hear all the time in a thousand different contexts of state and federal law, some highly technical. A good example from a few terms ago is Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on what is or is not a money order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/145orig_kjfl.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/145orig_kjfl.pdf The oral argument was quite entertaining, IIRC: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/22O145 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/22O145