4 ms·
If one party is doing worse and the other is doing better that could be a sign that there's not much to it. They're generally going to have access to similar in
by majormajor 2y ago
If one party is doing worse and the other is doing better that could be a sign that there's not much to it. They're generally going to have access to similar information/groups/etc. Otherwise a theory that one party is "better at corruption" vs "if you grab subsets of people at random some of the sets will be above-average" is dubiously-supported.
https://www.fa-mag.com/news/how-to-invest-like-members-of-congress-who-won-big-78736.html?print https://www.fa-mag.com/news/how-to-invest-like-members-of-co... Per this, KRUZ is lagging the S&P 500 YTD.
And in fact the case it makes is actually less convincing? "In total, 37 members of Congress beat the S&P 500 in 2023, according to stock and options data company Unusual Whales." 37 members of congress is a small subset.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]