Overturning Chevron itself didn't allow for that, but the (less talked about but just as important) ruling in Corner Post did. The court ruled the default statu

Overturning Chevron itself didn't allow for that, but the (less talked about but just as important) ruling in Corner Post did. The court ruled the default statute of limitations for an injury caused by a regulatory agency is six years from the time of first injury, instead of six years from the enactment of the policy (what it was originally). This means any interested party can create a new entity, fund it, and have it be injured by the policy they wish to challenge; and finally use it as the vehicle to sue the agency. Wherever this entity is created would then be where it'd have standing to sue, allowing for the shopping of a friendly judge. https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/07/supreme-court-expands-time-frame-to-sue-federal-agencies/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/07/supreme-court-expands-tim...