3 ms·

You mean the rug pull on 40 years of legal precedent? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoJZu_EaDeM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoJZu_EaDeM People have to s

You mean the rug pull on 40 years of legal precedent? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoJZu_EaDeM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoJZu_EaDeM People have to stop looking for the moral high ground in dealing with domestic threats. Two impeachment processes were just filed today... The US politics is so Bonkers... bag of popcorn ready =3

nsxwolf 2y ago
Sounds to me like Loper Bright Enterprises was the little guy getting absolutely reamed by the government after NOAA out of nowhere decided to start charging them $700 per day per fishing vessel. Chevron Deference would have continued but the government simply couldn't help themselves.
- renewiltord 2y ago
  Yeah, this is just another in a long list of "this is why we can't have nice things". It's not really that different from the Bay Area deciding that they'll give sheriffs the right to decide who gets a concealed carry warrant and then one of those sheriffs deciding that she'd prefer getting paid to give them out.
  - theossuary 2y ago
    It's funny because the supreme Court also provided an avenue for that to be done legally - https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-limits-scope-of-anti-bribery-law/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-limits-scop...
    - hindsightbias 2y ago
      So Sheriffs could take gratuities to deny ccw permits... Maybe a patreon for each denial.
    - renewiltord 2y ago
      Ha, I think she retired before she could be prosecuted or anything. Should have stuck it out!
- hindsightbias 2y ago
  Loper Bright appears to be more narrow wrt to FERC https://natlawreview.com/article/analysis-loper-brights-and-jarkesys-impacts-federal-energy-regulatory-commission https://natlawreview.com/article/analysis-loper-brights-and-...
phone8675309 2y ago
[flagged]
mardifoufs 2y ago
And the decision itself was a rug pull from many years of legal precedent too. Roe v Wade also did exactly just that. I presume you dislike those two decisions just as much as you dislike this one? Surely any decision that creates a new precedent will inherently be a rug pull?
- Joel_Mckay 2y ago
  > Surely any decision that creates a new precedent will inherently be a rug pull? Unless the "new precedent" is arbitrary random daily policy common in despotic regimes like Russia. i.e. one has no clue what will happen when they step outside everyday. In general, legal consensus is supposed to evolve from _many_ trials with civilians deciding on what legislated policy is appropriate to enforce for its residents. Giving 40 years of people that sat through jury duty in 8000 trials a troll... is not what justice, accountability, and due process is supposed to look like. It is not my opinion that matters... but I do like popcorn nom nom nom =3

nsxwolf 2y ago

Sounds to me like Loper Bright Enterprises was the little guy getting absolutely reamed by the government after NOAA out of nowhere decided to start charging them $700 per day per fishing vessel. Chevron Deference would have continued but the government simply couldn't help themselves.

renewiltord 2y ago
Yeah, this is just another in a long list of "this is why we can't have nice things". It's not really that different from the Bay Area deciding that they'll give sheriffs the right to decide who gets a concealed carry warrant and then one of those sheriffs deciding that she'd prefer getting paid to give them out.
- theossuary 2y ago
  It's funny because the supreme Court also provided an avenue for that to be done legally - https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-limits-scope-of-anti-bribery-law/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-limits-scop...
  - hindsightbias 2y ago
    So Sheriffs could take gratuities to deny ccw permits... Maybe a patreon for each denial.
  - renewiltord 2y ago
    Ha, I think she retired before she could be prosecuted or anything. Should have stuck it out!
hindsightbias 2y ago
Loper Bright appears to be more narrow wrt to FERC https://natlawreview.com/article/analysis-loper-brights-and-jarkesys-impacts-federal-energy-regulatory-commission https://natlawreview.com/article/analysis-loper-brights-and-...

phone8675309 2y ago

[flagged]

mardifoufs 2y ago

And the decision itself was a rug pull from many years of legal precedent too. Roe v Wade also did exactly just that. I presume you dislike those two decisions just as much as you dislike this one? Surely any decision that creates a new precedent will inherently be a rug pull?

Joel_Mckay 2y ago
> Surely any decision that creates a new precedent will inherently be a rug pull? Unless the "new precedent" is arbitrary random daily policy common in despotic regimes like Russia. i.e. one has no clue what will happen when they step outside everyday. In general, legal consensus is supposed to evolve from _many_ trials with civilians deciding on what legislated policy is appropriate to enforce for its residents. Giving 40 years of people that sat through jury duty in 8000 trials a troll... is not what justice, accountability, and due process is supposed to look like. It is not my opinion that matters... but I do like popcorn nom nom nom =3