3 ms·
Irrelevant images definitely cheapen the perceived quality of an article, but let's not conflate "AI image" with "irrelevant image." AI images are often at lea
by setsewerd 2y ago
Irrelevant images definitely cheapen the perceived quality of an article, but let's not conflate "AI image" with "irrelevant image."
AI images are often at least as relevant as a stock photo, if not more so (assuming the creator spent the extra 30 seconds to make a prompt that's more tailored to the content)
- JohnFen 2y ago> AI images are often at least as relevant as a stock photo That's damning with faint praise, as stock photos are rarely very relevant or add to the writing they're tacked onto.
- setsewerd 2y agoI agree, I just don't understand this newfound hatred of AI-generated stock photos, when stock photos have always been bland and almost never a value-add for content. I'm especially confused about this for feature images, because I would expect in most cases any helpful image (like a graph or diagram) would make for a really unattractive or incomprehensible thumbnail, and thumbnails are where featured images get the most exposure (social media previews etc).