If you're the author and interested in this kind of data based ceramics approach, then I recommend looking at: https://digitalfire.com/index.php https://digita

If you're the author and interested in this kind of data based ceramics approach, then I recommend looking at: https://digitalfire.com/index.php https://digitalfire.com/index.php by Tony Hansen. Found it awhile ago, and has: oxide lists: https://digitalfire.com/oxide/al2o3 https://digitalfire.com/oxide/al2o3 materials lists: https://digitalfire.com/material/list/1-9 https://digitalfire.com/material/list/1-9 recipes: https://digitalfire.com/recipe/list https://digitalfire.com/recipe/list firing schedules: https://digitalfire.com/schedule/list https://digitalfire.com/schedule/list ceramics properties tests: https://digitalfire.com/test/glfl https://digitalfire.com/test/glfl Frankly, I kind of ferret shocked when I read it. Way too much data, that nobody seems to use. Reading ceramics message boards and through Ceramics Monthly or Clay Times, they often appear to be in the dark ages from testing comparison