> I've always assumed that 'at will employment' would make employees significantly more fearful of losing their jobs in the US. Would that still be true in the

> I've always assumed that 'at will employment' would make employees significantly more fearful of losing their jobs in the US. Would that still be true in the particular case of RTO mandates? I don't think so since "showing up to work" fits nicely into existing employment law on both sides of the pond and is easily documented by employers. The point being that in this particular case of RTO mandates, at-will employment affords you the advantage of being more easily hired elsewhere, whereas you don't lose any practical protection.