3 ms·
> You should be maintaining stopping distance from your vehicle to the one in front. I am not so sure. In Germany, for example, the minimum required distance t
by lqet 2y ago
> You should be maintaining stopping distance from your vehicle to the one in front.
I am not so sure. In Germany, for example, the minimum required distance to the car in front of you is "speed in km/h divided by 2 in meters". So for 100 km/h, you are required to keep a minimum distance of 50 meters. I very much doubt that you can stop a car going 100 km/h within 50 meters.
- whartung 2y agoYou do t need to stop a 100 km/hr car in 50 meters because, barring that sudden brick wall appearing ahead of the car in front of you, they’re not stopping in 50m either. The 50m is the reaction buffer, not the stopping buffer. It’s also prudent to give more leeway to vehicles you can not see around to avoid the large truck swerving to avoid the refrigerator that just fell out of the truck in front of them problem.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- corobo 2y agoAt least with cars they also have the option to swerve away from the chaos if the stopping distance is too short. Not to disagree, just throwing in a variable that trains don't have
- andruby 2y agoThat's interesting, in Belgium I think it's "2 seconds", or at least that's what was promoted recently on the radio. You should be able to sing "Last night a DJ saved my live", which is a bit more than 2 seconds. I liked that, because it's one you can actually test for while driving. I find it a lot harder to estimate 50m while driving at 100km/h
- lqet 2y agoThe reflector posts are always exactly 50 meters apart, which makes this relatively easy.