You're doing the typical thing where you're attacking my specific example rather than the spirit of what I am saying - that I do not think it's a good thing tha

You're doing the typical thing where you're attacking my specific example rather than the spirit of what I am saying - that I do not think it's a good thing that politically appointed judges can overrule federal agencies, particularly in a political environment where politicians are (legally) bought and sold to the highest bidder, typically large corporate interests. I can come up with plenty of other hypotheticals for you to nitpick, but I find this discussion pointless and you obnoxious and clearly arguing in bad faith, so I won't.