5 ms·
Too many safety concerns raised by whistleblowers or stories about how poorly Boeing is being managed are not good reasons to risk your life. Why would you do
by onemoresoop 2y ago
Too many safety concerns raised by whistleblowers or stories about how poorly Boeing is being managed are not good reasons to risk your life. Why would you do it when there's an alternative? Maybe if flying with Boeing was heavily discounted people would want to incur the risk.
- thegrim33 2y agoYou're basing your decision off a handful of anecdotal reports whereas you could instead look at the literal billions of data points that say you have a better chance of winning your state lottery than ever dying on a Boeing plane. If you're worried about your safety, isn't the safety data what you should base your decisions off of?
- EricE 2y agoHandful? What are we up to - four? - magically dead Boeing whistleblowers? How many dead whistleblowers does it take before it moves from anecdotal to something else?
- onemoresoop 2y ago>You're basing your decision off a handful of anecdotal reports whereas you could instead look at the literal billions of data points that say you have a better chance of winning your state lottery than ever dying on a Boeing plane. If you're worried about your safety, isn't the safety data what you should base your decisions off of? It's your life, do what you want with it and I'll do the same with mine. Im aware that it may not be a rational decision, but a rational decision should be based on trust and trust is long gone. And there's an alternative, why risk it?
- DiggyJohnson 2y agoIt is essentially already discounted because [choosing to fly either Airbus or Boeing] is way more efficient and cheaper than [look for routes that don't fly Boeing].